A funeral on Monday. I find out at the funeral that my former boss has been in a coma for a week and it doesn't look like he'll come out of it. My friend whose wife's funeral I attended on Monday, on Thursday his mother tells his father in the morning that she feels weak. He takes her to the hospital and they think at first it's anemia but it's actually acute leukemia and she's bleeding interally and they're having trouble stopping the bleeding. She's not doing well and isn't likely to live very long. And today my mom trips and falls on the step leading to the walk in front of her house. She broke her nose, split her lip, cracked her front teeth and really scraped up her face. Knock wood, it could have been worse, she could have fractured her skull, but she's in alot of pain and she's 65 and a fall like that is really rough. Did I mention that I also have a horrendous cold. Not that it even registers on the scale of the other things, but it didn't help any. I'm keeping my fx for a better week.
And on a totally different note, it was DI weekend with a cover story in the
NY Times Magazine about Single Mothers by Choice and then a segment on 60 Minutes about donor siblings connecting through the Donor Sibling Registry.
I really disliked the article in the Times. It was really sensationalistic and focused mainly on two women who were both in the thinking/trying phase, how they searched for a donor and it seemed to conflate the search for a donor with their search for a mate. One of the women actually carried a picture of the donor in her wallet. Geez, like this is representative of SMCs out there? I actually recognize these two women from the SMC e-mail groups and had trouble believing that alot of what was written was accurate, but then one of the women proudly posted to one of the groups about how pleased she was with the article, so it must have been fairly accurate, at least about her. I wondered especially when it noted early on that in addition to the Single Mother by Choice moniker that SMCs also like to be called "Choice Moms". I'm a SMC and have been a part of the SMC world (e-mail groups, message boards, blogs) for years and have never heard anyone use that term before. But what really disappointed me was that the article really had little to do with the being a single
mother, it was really just focused on the sex and dating lives and donor choices of a few women. The one mother that it did profile got scant coverage other than to note that she was unusual in that she also had a boyfriend, not the father of her kids (she was pregnant with her second child through DI). I would love to see an article that delved into the reasons women really choose to be SMC, what the ramifications are for our lives and our children's lives, how our children are faring, how we fare in life. But I guess an article with a title on the cover of "Looking for Mr. Good Sperm" isn't going to go there.
After reading the Times article, I was dreading the 60 Minutes segment. I was pleasantly surprised. It was a fairly well-balanced piece that explained the whole concept of donor siblings. It showed nice well-adjusted moms who are expanding the concept of family in ways no one anticipated. I loved that the moms profiled were a lesbian couple and a SMC. I was a little leery when they actually tracked down the donor, but he seemed like a really nice guy and I loved that he said he didn't consider himself the father of these children. Overall, very good. I wonder if there will be an onslaught of people checking out the Donor Sibling Registry. Of course I'm sure they'll be surprised when they're expected to fork over $40 for the privilege of joining (a fee that was very conveniently raised just a couple of days before the 60 Minutes piece and that of course wasn't mentioned in it), that they soon may not even be able to view the listings of those who haven't paid the fee or that under new fiat no one is supposed to even post to the Yahoo group anymore for matches. I would love, love, love to see another group or site take up where the original Yahoo group left off, where people just posted for matches and there wasn't a self-appointed guardian of the information taking $$ off of people. I also wonder if it's legal to appropriate information listed on the Yahoo group and then place it in a database without the consent of the members. If I was a lawyer.....